{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"New Paradigm","provider_url":"https:\/\/newparadigm.law\/en\/","author_name":"adminDev","author_url":"https:\/\/newparadigm.law\/en\/author\/admindev\/","title":"What climate litigation reveals about judicial competence - New Paradigm","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0efmcxRcxS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/newparadigm.law\/en\/what-climate-litigation-reveals-about-judicial-competence\/\">What climate litigation reveals about judicial competence<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/newparadigm.law\/en\/what-climate-litigation-reveals-about-judicial-competence\/embed\/#?secret=0efmcxRcxS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;What climate litigation reveals about judicial competence&#8221; &#8212; New Paradigm\" data-secret=\"0efmcxRcxS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/newparadigm.law\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/newparadigm.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/judge-hold-wooden-gavel-with-golden-scale-globe-law-international-environmental-concepts-business-corporate-industry-law-world-environmental-regulationsustainable-environment-concept.webp","thumbnail_width":1920,"thumbnail_height":1200,"description":"In recent years, the U.S. and the Netherlands have been on opposing ends of the spectrum regarding climate litigation. Dutch courts have been an arena of social change in several revolutionary climate cases, while climate claims in the U.S. have been largely unsuccessful. In a way, this difference seems odd, because the U.S. judiciary has [&hellip;]"}